By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
BeFirsTrankBeFirsTrank
  • Home
  • Car Reviews
  • Auto Shows
  • Bike Reviews
  • Future
  • New Car
  • Used Car
  • Contact Us !
Reading: Picking Genders for Characters Could Be the Next Big Thing for Emoji
Share
Aa
Aa
BeFirsTrankBeFirsTrank
  • Home
  • Car Reviews
  • Auto Shows
  • Bike Reviews
  • Future
  • New Car
  • Used Car
  • Contact Us !
Search
  • Home
  • Car Reviews
  • Auto Shows
  • Bike Reviews
  • Future
  • New Car
  • Used Car
  • Contact Us !
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
© 2023 BeFirsTrank News Network
News

Picking Genders for Characters Could Be the Next Big Thing for Emoji

srijita
Last updated: 2016/03/02 at 3:59 PM
By srijita 2 Min Read
Share
SHARE
Picking Genders for Characters Could Be the Next Big Thing for Emoji

According to the common emoji keyboard, women don’t run. Only men run. See?

But that could soon change under a new draft proposal to the Unicode Consortium, the body that develops and maintains software standards for texts and characters. The document outlines a number of changes, including male, female and neutral gender options for many human-looking characters.

If adopted, this would follow Apple’s move last year to unveil a new set of emoji that allows users to pick skin tones, which came after calls for racially diverse emoji.

The new gender options would allow, for instance, a male or female runner.

And, the businessman who levitates? Now a businesswoman or businessperson can hover, for some reason. (Seriously, why is this person in a suit hovering?)

Other changes would allow for customizing hair color to black, blond, brown, red and gray, as well as bald. According to the proposal, the list of hair options come from “the distinctions made in the US Online Passport form, the UN Grounds Pass application, and other forms such as driver’s licenses.”

The proposal also includes changing the direction of characters to face left or right and the possibility for some regional flags.

Individual companies would still have to implement the changes, if adopted by Unicode, on their platforms. For instance, Google’s Android, which already has a set of gender-neutral emoji, doesn’t allow users to pick skin tones for emoji the way that Apple’s keyboard does.

Given the large number of possible combinations, the proposals states that it’s “anticipated that only certain combinations would be supported by major vendors.”

“There is no requirement or expectation that all of the possible combinations – or even any large subset of them – be supported by vendors, until there is technology in the fonts to deal with the combinatorics,” it states.

[“source-gadgets.ndtv”]

You Might Also Like

Beyond the Map: What Modern Vehicle Tracking Can Do for Your Business

What Should My Video Game Room Have?

From Traditional Payments to Innovative Solutions: How Car Insurance Is Adapting to Modern Needs

Step by Step in Selling Your Car Online

Why Use BMW Km Stopper?

TAGGED: Be, Big, Characters, Could, Emoji, for, Genders, Next, Picking, The, Thing
srijita March 2, 2016
Share
Previous Article Ola Undercuts Uber With ‘Micro’ Cabs at Rs. 6 per Kilometre
Next Article India Funding Roundup: A Customer Engagement Platform, Gym Aggregator, and More

Calendar

May 2025
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Apr    

Latest Trending News

  • Over the Next Ten Years, the Used Car Industry May 8, 2025
  • Beyond the Map: What Modern Vehicle Tracking Can Do for Your Business May 3, 2025
  • What Should My Video Game Room Have? April 28, 2025
  • Personalized advertising fuels growth and drives competitiveness for European businesses April 28, 2025
  • Personalization, AI, and the future of retail April 14, 2025
  • Europe’s New Car Buyers and Selected Sustainability April 8, 2025
  • Motor SRC 500 Review: A Powerful Cruiser April 4, 2025

© 2023 Befirstrank News Network. All Rights Reserved.

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?