(The following statement was released by the rating agency) LONDON, April 26 (Fitch) The prospect of greater restrictions on diesel-engine cars in Europe has not affected used car prices so far, but this could change if the restrictions caused a rapid and large shift of demand away from diesel cars, Fitch Ratings says. Implications for auto loan and lease ABS are likely to depend on the scope of the restrictions and how quickly they are introduced. Concerns about NO2 emissions have prompted Stuttgart to announce plans to stop some diesel cars entering the city when air quality is particularly poor. Similar restrictions have been discussed for Dusseldorf and Munich. Greater restrictions on the use of diesel cars in Germany and elsewhere appear likely. The Stuttgart announcement followed European Commission warnings to Germany, France, Spain, Italy and the UK for failing to cut NO2 levels. Last year, the mayors of Paris, Madrid, and Athens announced plans to ban diesel vehicles from city centres by 2025.
The chief impact of such initiatives on auto ABS transactions would be felt in deals with residual value (RV) exposure (where obligors can return the vehicle in lieu of final payments) if used diesel car prices fell sharply below the price assumed within the contractual RV amount. In such transactions, RV risk often outweighs obligor default risk. Transactions with no RV exposure would only be indirectly affected by lower recovery proceeds from defaulted clients. There is no evidence so far of any impact on used diesel car prices. Whether this happens will depend on how widespread and severe the eventual restrictions are – both geographically and regarding the types of vehicles affected – and on the response of manufacturers and customers. Diesel remains an important component of manufacturers’ attempts to meet carbon emissions targets while the market for electric and hybrid cars develops. High mileage diesel drivers may be less affected by restrictions on driving in urban areas. Scrappage schemes, which press reports say the UK has considered, could place a temporary floor under prices. However, a declining share of new car sales in Germany, coupled with press reports that it is taking longer to sell used diesel cars due to decreasing demand, bolsters our view that regulatory pressures could eventually hit used diesel car prices. Prices could also suffer due to company-specific environmental agendas (company fleets comprise a high share of diesel cars).
If used diesel car prices fell and the time to sale increased, the impact on ABS transactions would depend on factors such as the proportion of diesel cars in the underlying pool and the RV exposure. There could be an offsetting short-term effect from higher demand for petrol-powered vehicles. We already stress transactions for steep declines in used car prices due to unexpected macroeconomic deterioration and/or changes in consumer preferences. Transactions backed by diesel cars which comply with the EU’s latest ‘Euro 6’ anti-pollution standard (predominantly sold from late 2015), would probably be less affected (Stuttgart’s proposed restriction would not cover these vehicles). Transactions that have amortised will have larger buffers against losses, due to increased credit enhancement (CE). Typically, initial CE increases by at least 2pp-3pp in the first year after closing for senior notes and even faster in years thereafter. Our assessment of these factors would be reflected in the transaction-specific RV and recovery assumptions that we apply to capture the risk that future sale proceeds fall due to changes in consumer preferences. In UK transactions, we analyse the RV risk embedded in widely used personal contract purchase (PCP) contracts under the same framework as for auto leases elsewhere. Voluntary termination rights introduce used car value exposure to all contracts governed by applicable consumer legislation, but in today’s PCP-dominated ABS portfolios, these are less important from a ratings perspective. Contact: Eberhard Hackel Senior Director, Structured Finance +49 69 768076 117 Fitch Deutschland GmbH Taunusanlage 17 D-60325 Frankfurt am Main Thomas Krug Associate Director, Structured Finance +49 69 768076 252 Mark Brown Senior Analyst, Fitch Wire +44 203 530 1588 Media Relations: Athos Larkou, London, Tel: +44 203 530 1549, Email: [email protected]. The above article originally appeared as a post on the Fitch Wire credit market commentary page. The original article can be accessed at www.fitchratings.com. All opinions expressed are those of Fitch Ratings. ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY’S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH’S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE here. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2017 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001
[“Source-reuters”]